freedom fries?
So, let me get this straight - instead of "French fries," they're "Freedom Fries" now because those dastardly French have the temerity to disagree with Dubya's cowboy brinksmanship disguised as foreign policy?
Freedom fries? Freedom toast?
Freedom fries? Freedom toast?
FREEDOM FRIES? FREEDOM frelling TOAST?
In case no one else in this country stops snoring and bothers to say it, let me jump around and yell a bit in the hopes that someone will hear it:
Members of the House of Representatives: You are all wankers. As you have proven yourselves useless, please shoot yourselves for the good of your country.
Before I go any further, let's put the blame where blame is due: Representative Walter Jones, North Carolina, who originally circulated letter suggesting this change, and Representative Bob Ney of Ohio, who spearheaded the effort to have this name change made in the House cafeteria.
In the end, they answer to their own constituents, but I should think a flurry of emailed and written rebukes might work nicely. Need some help? Here are some helpful ways to get started:
Walter Jones' contact information:
Snailmail:
Rep. Walter Jones
United States House of Representatives
422 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
DC Phone: (202) 225-3415
DC Fax: (202) 225-3286
N.C. Phone: (252) 931-1003
1-800-351-1697 toll-free (for NC residents only)
N.C. Fax: (252) 931-1002
Bob Ney's contact information:
Snailmail:
Rep. Bob Ney
2438 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
DC Phone: (202) 225-6265
I can't wrap my brain around just how incredibly stupid, pigheaded, and insulting this move is. This is supposed to be "symbolic" of our support of our troops. Symbolic? Oh, it most definitely is - symbolic of how immediately snotty our president and our elected officials become when the rest of the world doesn't want to play by American rules.
Gee, Bush wants a war. Wants to finish what his daddy started, I suppose. Congratulations - looks like he's going to get a rollicking good war - at the expense of American lives, any semblance of international agreement (much less cooperation), and any remaining slivers of goodwill left in the international community.
So, our president is going to aim, full speed ahead, at Iraq, while making conspicuous tests of a 21,000-pound bomb to make his point, which currently appears to be "Do what I say or we'll smack you around with this."
Where is Congress? This should be their moment to shine, to question the president's actions, to serve as a dissenting (or at least questioning) voice on what appears to be the eve of a war. Instead, they urge us to support our troops, beating the drums of patriotism with freedom fries and freedom toast.
Shame.
Better to be silent than to offer misbegotten 'support' in this political-stunt guise.
Mark my words carefully, reader. Do not construe my distrust of my president and his actions as a lack of support for the troops of this country. Nor should you construe my words to imply that I believe Saddam Hussein is a great, misunderstood leader; I believe him to be a dictator and a butcher.
But as the tone of a word is as important as its literal meaning, so are intentions and insinuations that accompany an action as important as the action itself. The French - and the rest of the world - will not remember this symbolic legislative action as being supportive of American military; they will see it for what it rightly is: an insult and a barely-veiled threat.
I love my country, but the people who govern it scare the crap out of me.
Comments